Damned Heretics

Condemned by the established, but very often right

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

Qualified outsiders and maverick insiders are often right about the need to replace received wisdom in science and society, as the history of the Nobel prize shows. This blog exists to back the best of them in their uphill assault on the massively entrenched edifice of resistance to and prejudice against reviewing, let alone revising, ruling ideas. In support of such qualified dissenters and courageous heretics we search for scientific paradigms and other established beliefs which may be maintained only by the power and politics of the status quo, comparing them with academic research and the published experimental and investigative record.

We especially defend and support the funding of honest, accomplished, independent minded and often heroic scientists, inventors and other original thinkers and their right to free speech and publication against the censorship, mudslinging, false arguments, ad hominem propaganda, overwhelming crowd prejudice and internal science politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, health and medicine, diet and nutrition.


Henry Bauer, Peter Breggin , Harvey Bialy, Giordano Bruno, Erwin Chargaff, Nicolaus Copernicus, Francis Crick, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw, Freeman Dyson, Peter Duesberg, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman, John Fewster, Galileo Galilei, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Edward Jenner, Benjamin Jesty, Michio Kaku, Adrian Kent, Ernst Krebs, Thomas Kuhn, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling, Eric Penrose, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick, Sherwood Rowland, Carl Sagan, Otto Rossler, Fred Singer, Thomas Szasz, Alfred Wegener, Edward O. Wilson, James Watson.

Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

Skepticism is dangerous. That’s exactly its function, in my view. It is the business of skepticism to be dangerous. And that’s why there is a great reluctance to teach it in schools. That’s why you don’t find a general fluency in skepticism in the media. On the other hand, how will we negotiate a very perilous future if we don’t have the elementary intellectual tools to ask searching questions of those nominally in charge, especially in a democracy? – Carl Sagan (The Burden of Skepticism, keynote address to CSICOP Annual Conference, Pasadena, April 3/4, 1982).

It is really important to underscore that everything we’re talking about tonight could be utter nonsense. – Brian Greene (NYU panel on Hidden Dimensions June 5 2010, World Science Festival)

I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing ever interfered with my learning was my education. My name as you already perceive without a doubt is George Bernard Shaw, and I certainly approve of this blog, in that its guiding spirit appears to be blasphemous in regard to the High Church doctrines of science, and it flouts the censorship of the powers that be, and as I have famously remarked, all great truths begin as blasphemy, and the first duty of the truthteller is to fight censorship, and while I notice that its seriousness of purpose is often alleviated by a satirical irony which sometimes borders on the facetious, this is all to the good, for as I have also famously remarked, if you wish to be a dissenter, make certain that you frame your ideas in jest, otherwise they will seek to kill you.  My own method was always to take the utmost trouble to find the right thing to say, and then to say it with the utmost levity. (Photo by Alfred Eisenstaedt for Life magazine) One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison, but anything that goes beyond this is voluntary submission to an unnecessary tyranny, and is likely to interfere with happiness in all kinds of ways. – Bertrand Russell, Conquest of Happiness (1930) ch. 9

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Belief)

Expanded GUIDE TO SITE PURPOSE AND LAYOUT is in the lower blue section at the bottom of every home page.

Manhattan quietly infiltrated by radical science group

Revolutionaries plan further gains in HIV?AIDS row

As an answer to the UN “AIDS at 25” celebration last weekend (which was described to this author today at the UN by an official there in the following terms: “Did you ever see such a job creation machine?”), the members of the Committee for the Reappraisal of HIV/AIDS flew into New York City from Europe and the West Coast this evening to meet at the Roosevelt Hotel, a midtown holdover from the past and therefore suitable for modern samurai fighting for old fashioned standards in science to rest their heads.

Currently the best choice in hotels in New York for anybody who understands that long etablished is good, the Pakistani owned hotel is still splendid in an old fashioned way, with its personable staff and marble floors and polished brass and wood and fleur de lis carpets and one of the city’s best kept secrets, its bar, which is grand and cosy at the same time. Apparently when asked for an Internet connection to a meeting room it charges through the nose for a T1 line, the staff not yet having heard of wireless.

After a sojourn at said bar to gather their wits and energy, twelve of the core members and a couple of guests moved to the Jewel of India, a spacious curry restaurant along from the Harvard Club, where they bonded in preparation for two days of concentrated discussion on future strategy in the information war in this field, which has resisted free debate on the cause and cure of HIV?AIDS for two decades.

Among the highlights of the sessions at a nearby location will be a Sunday morning presentation by the renowned scientist, amiable, joking and very sharp Peter Duesberg, which invited guests will also attend, including four filmmakers at last count, with cameramen.

Other members of the board at the meeting will include Neville Hodgkinson, the London Sunday Times correspondent who wrote a huge series exposing the problems of the field and its science in the mid nineties, the diminutive bombshell Joan Shenton, who has made several award winning documentaries on the topic for independent TV in London, the slim progressive Christine Maggiore, whose book has long been the best rundown for the layman who wishes to know what is going on, tall, mustachioed David Crowe, who runs the Alberta group of independent thinkers on AIDS, hardbitten renegade Frank Lusardi the distinguished designer of million dollar dot com boom websites, long dark haired Bryan Owen, Alabama webmaster of the Committee for the Reappraising AIDS website, the Panlike Claus Koehlein a medical authority from Germany who has just published a book on “Virus Mania”, unfortunately so far still in German, and the very tall San Fransciscan angel Robert Leppo, the investor who has backed Duesberg’s research on the same principle as the start ups he finances, which is that he believes in him personally.

A number of journalists and authors in the field and out of it will be attending the open session also, including Celia Farber of Harpers’s who just published the LA CityBeat clarification of the Maggiore tragedy, Anthony Liversidge a science freelancer who is writing a book on the abuse of trust in modern science, Marcus Cohen, who has devoted seven columns in the past year in the Townsend Letter to the topic of HIV?AIDS and its errors, and Robert Houston, the independent medical authority in cancer who has heavily researched HIV?AIDS, and others.

Special note: If anyone here wishes to attend, they should email us, since we have been given several invitations to pass on.

4 Responses to “Manhattan quietly infiltrated by radical science group”

  1. Mark Biernbaum Says:

    Gosh, I’d love one of those invites, Truthseeker. Can I get one from you?

  2. DB Says:

    Sounds exciting! I’d be quite pleased just to meet all of these people.

  3. noreen martin Says:

    Me too, what a wonderful support group!

  4. HankBarnes Says:

    Well Done, Truthseeker! Take a bite outta the Big Apple for me. Great buncha folks ya got there.

    Hank Barnes

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Bad Behavior has blocked 302 access attempts in the last 7 days.